The Center for Law and the Public's Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities drafted the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA or Model Act) at the request of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Model Act provides state actors with the powers they need to detect and contain bioterrorism or a naturally occurring disease outbreak. Legislative bills based on the MSEHPA have been introduced in 34 states. Problems of obsolescence, inconsistency, and inadequacy may render current state laws ineffective or even counterproductive. State laws often date back to the early 20th century and have been built up in layers over the years. They frequently predate the vast changes in the public health sciences and constitutional law. The Model Act is structured to reflect 5 basic public health functions to be facilitated by law: (1) preparedness, comprehensive planning for a public health emergency; (2) surveillance, measures to detect and track public health emergencies; (3) management of property, ensuring adequate availability of vaccines, pharmaceuticals, and hospitals, as well as providing power to abate hazards to the public's health; (4) protection of persons, powers to compel vaccination, testing, treatment, isolation, and quarantine when clearly necessary; and (5) communication, providing clear and authoritative information to the public. The Model Act also contains a modernized, extensive set of principles and requirements to safeguard personal rights. Law can be a tool to improve public health preparedness. A constitutional democracy must balance the common good with respect for personal dignity, toleration of groups, and adherence to principles of justice.
Annas GJ. Annas GJ. JAMA. 2002 Dec 4;288(21):2685-6; author reply 2686-7. JAMA. 2002. PMID: 12460084 No abstract available.
Orient JM. Orient JM. JAMA. 2002 Dec 4;288(21):2686; author reply 2686-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.21.2686-jlt1204-2-2. JAMA. 2002. PMID: 12460085 No abstract available.
Hodge JG Jr. Hodge JG Jr. Account Res. 2003 Apr-Jun;10(2):91-107. doi: 10.1080/08989620300507. Account Res. 2003. PMID: 14577422
Reich DS. Reich DS. J Contemp Health Law Policy. 2003 Spring;19(2):379-414. J Contemp Health Law Policy. 2003. PMID: 14748251 Review. No abstract available.
Erickson DL, Gostin LO, Street J, Mills SP. Erickson DL, et al. J Law Med Ethics. 2002 Fall;30(3 Suppl):57-62. J Law Med Ethics. 2002. PMID: 12508504
Bayer R, Colgrove J. Bayer R, et al. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Nov-Dec;21(6):98-101. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.6.98. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002. PMID: 12442844
Moulton AD, Gottfried RN, Goodman RA, Murphy AM, Rawson RD. Moulton AD, et al. J Law Med Ethics. 2003 Winter;31(4):672-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00134.x. J Law Med Ethics. 2003. PMID: 14968669 Review.
Gaddas AM, Ben Dhiab M, Ben Saad H. Gaddas AM, et al. Libyan J Med. 2024 Dec 31;19(1):2337475. doi: 10.1080/19932820.2024.2337475. Epub 2024 Apr 3. Libyan J Med. 2024. PMID: 38569155 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Su Z, McDonnell D, Bentley BL, He J, Shi F, Cheshmehzangi A, Ahmad J, Jia P. Su Z, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 25;23(5):e26109. doi: 10.2196/26109. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 33961583 Free PMC article. Review.
Cave E. Cave E. Leg Stud (Soc Leg Scholars). 2017 Jun;37(2):279-304. doi: 10.1111/lest.12144. Epub 2016 Dec 1. Leg Stud (Soc Leg Scholars). 2017. PMID: 32336855 Free PMC article.
Sharma R, Hossain MM. Sharma R, et al. Indian J Community Med. 2019 Jul-Sep;44(3):188-192. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_110_19. Indian J Community Med. 2019. PMID: 31602100 Free PMC article.
Mittelstadt B, Benzler J, Engelmann L, Prainsack B, Vayena E. Mittelstadt B, et al. Life Sci Soc Policy. 2018 May 9;14(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40504-018-0074-1. Life Sci Soc Policy. 2018. PMID: 29744694 Free PMC article.